• Dick Lieberman,Consultant

Don't Make the Mistake of Thinking the First Decision Controls an Appeal Date--the Date of the L

Under the Contract Disputes Act of 1978, a contractor may appeal to a Board of Contract Appeals an adverse contracting officer’s (“CO”) final decision within 90 days of receipt of the CO’s final decision. If the contractor elects to go to the U.S. Court of Federal Claims, it has one year to appeal by filing a complaint. The Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals (“ASBCA”) considered a situation where the CO issued more than one final decision. When that happens, what is the controlling date for the 90 days? Frasson Lodovico S.r.l., ASBCA No. 58645, Feb. 10, 2014. It is the date of the last final decision, not the first.

Frasson had a design build contract in Italy for the U.S. Government. The sequence of events was as follows:

  • On April 26, 2012, Frasson submitted a certified clam for a variety of additional items.

  • On Jan. 22, 2013, the CO issued a final decision by letter, which was addressed to Mr. Rodolfo Prischich, whom the CO believed represented Frasson, but this was incorrect.

  • On Feb. 5, 2013, Frasson received a copy of the final decision by certified mail

  • On February 25, 2013, the CO issued a correction to his January 22nd final decision.

  • On May 1, 2013, Frasson filed a notice of appeal, and attached both the January 22nd decision, and the February 25th decision.

The Government sought to dismiss the appeal, claiming it had been filed 97 days after receipt of the CO’s final decision, which was alleged to be January 22, 2013.

The Board rejected the Government’s arguments, noting that where multiple copies of a CO’s final decision have been provided to Appellant, the latest received decision begins the 90 day period for appeal. The board noted that the appeal was of the corrected decision, and the appeal was filed on day 85 after receipt of that decision. Earlier decisions on the same claim do not count for the 90 day appeal period.

TIP: When a contractor receives one CO final decision, it has 90 days to appeal it to a Board. But if a CO subsequent modifies or corrects that decision, the 90 day appeal period will begin to run again. So the contractor would essentially have two “bites of the apple.” If the contractor had appealed the initial decision before the correction, then any corrected or modified decision would be transmitted to the Board and considered during the appeal proceedings.

Recent Posts

See All

Mistakes in Certifying Your Claim

In a recent Civilian Board of Contract Appeals case, Development Alternatives, Inc. v. Agency for Int’l Dev., CBCA 5942 et. al, September 27, 2018, the Board considered an appeal of a claim for $1.9 m

Use Caution with Rubber Stamps

Is a rubber stamped signature of the President of a company on a release of claims valid? The Civilian Board of Contract Appeals, under the facts in Penna Group, LLC v. Dept of Justice, CBCA 6155, Se

This website was developed by Richard Lieberman, a government contracts consultant and retired attorney who is the author of both "The 100 Worst Mistakes in Government Contracting" (with Jason Morgan) and "The 100 Worst Government Mistakes in Government Contracting." Richard Lieberman concentrates on Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) consulting and training, including  commercial item contracting (FAR Part 12), compliance with proposal requirements(FAR Part 15 negotiated procurement), sealed bidding (FAR Part 14), compliance with solicitation requirements, contract administration (FAR Part 42), contract modifications and changes (FAR Part 43), subcontracting and flowdown requirements (FAR Part 44), government property (FAR Part 45), quality assurance (FAR Part 46), obtaining invoiced payments owed to contractors,  and other compliance with the FAR.   See LinkedIn profile at https://www.linkedin.com/in/richard-d-lieberman-3a25257a/.This website and blog are for educational and information purposes only.  Nothing posted on this website constitutes legal advice, which can only be obtained from a qualified attorney. Website Owner/Consultant does not engage in the practice of law and will not provide legal advice or legal services based on competence and standing in the law. Legal filings and other aspects of a legal practice must be performed by an appropriate attorney. Using this website does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Although the author strives to present accurate information, the information provided on this site is not guaranteed to be complete, correct or up-to-date.  The views expressed on this blog are solely those of the author. FAR Consulting & Training, Tel. 202-520-5780, rliebermanconsultant@gmail.com

Copyright © 2020 Richard D. Lieberman

This site was designed with the
website builder. Create your website today.
Start Now