• Dick Lieberman,Consultant

Mistakes in Selecting the Forum for Service Contract /Davis-Bacon Act Issues


Where should contractors litigate matters involving the Service Contract Act, 41 U.S.C. Chapter 67 and the Davis-Bacon Act, 40 U.S.C. Chapter 31, subchapter IV? There is an interesting question of whether or not the Boards of Contract Appeals (as opposed to the Department of Labor, or DOL) have jurisdiction over these types of disputes. A recent case, Alcazar Trades, Inc., CBCA 5837, Feb. 27, 2018, is a case where the Civilian Board found that the dispute was solely within DOL’s jurisdiction, and dismissed an appeal involving a wage determination. There are other cases which are distinguishable, as explained below, where the BCA’s will accept jurisdiction under certain circumstances.

Alcazar negotiated a new collective bargaining agreement (“CBA”) under a GSA schedule contract, and submitted the new CBA to the agency (Nuclear Regulatory Commission) contracting officer, requesting upward wage adjustments in the contract option years. The contracting officer denied the claim, and Alcazar appealed. The Civilian Board, however, dismissed the case for lack of jurisdiction because the Department of Labor never issued a new wage determination.

The Board noted that deciding whether a particular CBA should form the basis of a new wage determination for the option years is left to the DOL. The Board stated that the DOL regulations in 29 CFR Part 7 set forth the [exclusive] procedure for appellant to follow …concerning correct wage determination to be used in its contract” and the “regulations leave it to DOL to decide whether the …CBA should have formed the basis of a wage determination for the contracting officer to apply when considering a price adjustment.” Alcazar asserted that the Board had jurisdiction because the CO failed to fulfill his duty to obtain a new wage determination based on the CBA, but the Board noted that it was only DOL that had the right to decide whether the new CBA should form the basis of a wage determination—and DOL had not done that. Therefore the case was dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

There are numerous cases, however, where the Boards accept jurisdiction of a dispute—but only where that dispute centers on the contractual rights and obligations of the parties. “The Board maintains jurisdiction, even though matters related to, and decided exclusively by the Department of Labor are part of the factual predicate.” Central Paving, Inc., ASBCA No. 38658, 90-1 BCA ¶ 22305. Examples are:

  • Where a contracting officer improperly refuses to comply with DOL’s determination of specific wage classifications of employees. IBI Security Servs., Inc.,ASBCA No. 38960, 90-2 BCA ¶22687.

  • Where a dispute concerns whether, when the contract was awarded, there was a mistake (mutual or unilateral) as to the applicability of the Davis-Bacon Act to contractor’s employees. Central Paving, Inc., ASBCA No. 38658, 90-1 BCA ¶ 22305.

  • Where an appellant alleged that job descriptions and descriptions of labor classifications conflicted with local area practice and that there was no disclosure of a local area practice of classifying employees; where appellant alleged there was Government misrepresentation in the laborer job descriptions in the solicitations and contracts; where appellant alleged that the contracting agency withheld superior knowledge in that it knew or should have known about local area practice, and where the appellant alleged that the contracting agency did not understand local practices and had made a mistake in the contract. Emerald Maint, Inc., ASBCA No. 36628, 88-3 BCA ¶ 21103.

The Takeaway: “Purely” labor issues tend to be assigned to and reserved to the Department of Labor, however, even where matters in a dispute are so reserved, the Boards will take jurisdiction when the dispute centers on the contractual rights and obligations of the parties in a particular contract. Be careful in evaluating the particular category where your dispute lies, in order to determine if you should submit a contract claim, or a request to the DOL.

For other helpful suggestions on government contracting, visit:

Richard D. Lieberman’s FAR Consulting & Training at https://www.richarddlieberman.com/, and Mistakes in Government Contracting at https://richarddlieberman.wixsite.com/mistakes/.


Recent Posts

See All

Use Caution with Rubber Stamps

Is a rubber stamped signature of the President of a company on a release of claims valid? The Civilian Board of Contract Appeals, under the facts in Penna Group, LLC v. Dept of Justice, CBCA 6155, Se

This website was developed by Richard Lieberman, a government contracts consultant and retired attorney who is the author of both "The 100 Worst Mistakes in Government Contracting" (with Jason Morgan) and "The 100 Worst Government Mistakes in Government Contracting." Richard Lieberman concentrates on Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) consulting and training, including  commercial item contracting (FAR Part 12), compliance with proposal requirements(FAR Part 15 negotiated procurement), sealed bidding (FAR Part 14), compliance with solicitation requirements, contract administration (FAR Part 42), contract modifications and changes (FAR Part 43), subcontracting and flowdown requirements (FAR Part 44), government property (FAR Part 45), quality assurance (FAR Part 46), obtaining invoiced payments owed to contractors,  and other compliance with the FAR.   See LinkedIn profile at https://www.linkedin.com/in/richard-d-lieberman-3a25257a/.This website and blog are for educational and information purposes only.  Nothing posted on this website constitutes legal advice, which can only be obtained from a qualified attorney. Website Owner/Consultant does not engage in the practice of law and will not provide legal advice or legal services based on competence and standing in the law. Legal filings and other aspects of a legal practice must be performed by an appropriate attorney. Using this website does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Although the author strives to present accurate information, the information provided on this site is not guaranteed to be complete, correct or up-to-date.  The views expressed on this blog are solely those of the author. FAR Consulting & Training, Tel. 202-520-5780, rliebermanconsultant@gmail.com

Copyright © 2020 Richard D. Lieberman

This site was designed with the
.com
website builder. Create your website today.
Start Now